US signals NATO force cuts

Why it matters

The Trump administration has told NATO allies it plans to reduce the U.S. military capabilities earmarked for the alliance in a major crisis, according to Reuters and subsequent reporting this week. The proposed cuts would affect forces assigned to the NATO Force Model, the alliance’s readiness framework for crisis and wartime reinforcement. Reuters reported on May 20 that Washington was preparing to shrink that pool, and a follow-up Reuters report on May 26 said the reductions would include bombers, fighter jets, warships and support aircraft. The change does not mean a formal U.S. withdrawal from NATO. The NATO Force Model is the system under which allies identify forces that can be activated in peacetime, crisis or conflict, with readiness bands ranging from 0-10 days to 30-180 days. NATO says the model replaced the older NATO Response Force and is meant to give commanders a larger, more structured pool of pre-identified forces. (usnews.com) ### What exactly is Washington cutting? Reuters reported on May 26, citing Spiegel, that the United States aims to provide only half the previous number of strategic bombers to the NATO pool. The same report said the number of U.S. fighter jets assigned would fall by a third, fewer destroyers would be made available, and the United States no longer intends to provide submarines to the alliance under that framework. It also said Europe would have to provide more of its own reconnaissance drones while Washington scaled back armed drone support. (nato.int) Alexander Velez-Green, a key aide to Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby, was identified by Reuters as the U.S. official likely to deliver the message in Brussels. Reuters said NATO policy chiefs were due to hear the U.S. position at a Friday meeting, and later reported that an envoy of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had already briefed senior officials at NATO headquarters. (defensenews.com) ### Is this about troops in Europe or wartime backup forces? The Reuters reports describe cuts to the forces the United States would make available to NATO during a major crisis, not just to permanently stationed troops. That distinction matters because the NATO Force Model is a contingency pool: allies designate units and assets that can be activated if commanders need reinforcement during war or another emergency. NATO says the model covers national forces available in peacetime, crisis and conflict, including forward-deployed forces and reinforcements. (usnews.com) At the same time, the force-model review has landed amid wider uncertainty over the U.S. military footprint in Europe. Reuters said Trump has pressed European governments to assume primary responsibility for the continent’s conventional defense, while keeping the U.S. nuclear guarantee in place. (usnews.com) ### What has NATO said in public? Mark Rutte, NATO’s secretary-general, said last week that a reduced U.S. role in conventional force planning was expected as Europe and Canada increased spending and capabilities. Reuters quoted Rutte as saying the move was “to be expected” and “only right” as the alliance works to end “over-reliance” on one ally. In a NATO transcript published May 20, Rutte also said allies were increasing defense spending and industrial production to support that shift. (usnews.com) CNBC reported on May 22 that Rutte said NATO members would spend “hundreds of billions” of dollars more on defense in coming years and that many were accelerating plans to reach the alliance’s newer 5% target by 2035. ### If Europe is spending more, why are officials still worried? The spending increase has not resolved questions about usable capacity. (usnews.com) CNBC quoted Rutte saying, “The money is great, but we also need to spend it,” including on industrial output. The Associated Press, in a separate report on Europe’s rearmament effort, said the continent’s fragmented defense industry and long reliance on U.S. systems could slow any move toward greater autonomy. (cnbc.com) Airbus defense executive Jean-Brice Dumont told AP that “the journey until we get full autonomy is a long journey.” That is the gap behind the current debate: higher budgets are arriving faster than new production lines, logistics chains and trained forces. Reuters said the United States will provide further details at a force generation conference in early June, where allies are expected to see more clearly which governments will be asked to fill the gaps. (defensenews.com) (cnbc.com)

Key numbers

• officials told NATO allies in May 2026 that Washington plans to shrink forces assigned to the alliance’s crisis-response pool.
• Reuters reported on May 20 that Washington was preparing to shrink that pool, and a follow-up Reuters report on May 26 said the reductions would include bombers, fighter jets, warships and support aircraft.
• The NATO Force Model is the system under which allies identify forces that can be activated in peacetime, crisis or conflict, with readiness bands ranging from 0-10 days to 30-180 days.
• Reuters reported on May 26, citing Spiegel, that the United States aims to provide only half the previous number of strategic bombers to the NATO pool.

What happens next

• The Trump administration has told NATO allies it plans to reduce the U.S.
• Reuters reported on May 20 that Washington was preparing to shrink that pool, and a follow-up Reuters report on May 26 said the reductions would include bombers, fighter jets, warships and support aircraft.
• Reuters reported on May 26, citing Spiegel, that the United States aims to provide only half the previous number of strategic bombers to the NATO pool.

Sources

• usnews.com
• nato.int
• defensenews.com
• cnbc.com

Quick answers