India, Pakistan ex-generals met twice
- Retired Indian and Pakistani generals and diplomats met at least twice in the last three months, with sessions in Qatar and another Asian capital. - The meetings were informal Track 2 contacts, not official diplomacy, and came after a year with no formal India-Pakistan engagement. - They matter because public ties remain frozen after the 2025 crisis, but both sides still need quiet crisis-management channels.
India-Pakistan diplomacy is back in the news — but not the official kind. A report in The Indian Express says retired Indian and Pakistani army generals and former diplomats have met at least twice in the last three months, including in Qatar and another Asian capital. That is small on paper. But in this relationship, even small contact matters, because formal dialogue has basically been frozen since the military crisis of May 2025. ### Why is this news at all? Because there has been almost no open political contact to talk about. After the 2025 clash, India and Pakistan pulled relations down to one of their lowest points in years. That left a familiar problem — two nuclear-armed rivals still need some way to read each other, even when they are publicly refusing to engage. These retired-official meetings are a way to do that without either government admitting it has softened. (indianexpress.com) ### Who actually met? Not sitting ministers. Not serving foreign secretaries. The people in these meetings were former army generals and retired diplomats from both sides. That matters because they know the military and diplomatic machinery well enough to test ideas, but they are not formally negotiating on behalf of their governments. In South Asia jargon, this is Track 2 — unofficial dialogue among people with real experience and access. (indianexpress.com) ### Where did the meetings happen? One meeting was in Qatar. Another was in a different Asian capital that the report does not name. The secrecy is part of the point. These talks only work if they are deniable, low-pressure, and away from the daily TV-war cycle in both countries. A flashy venue or public agenda would kill the usefulness immediately. (indianexpress.com) ### Is this the first contact since the 2025 crisis? Not quite. A Reuters report in April said there had already been at least four back-channel meetings after Operation Sindoor — two Track 1.5 meetings in London and Muscat, plus Track 2 sessions in Thailand and Doha. The newer Indian Express report looks narrower: it focuses on two recent meetings involving retired generals and diplomats over the last three months. So the real picture seems to be ongoing quiet contact through more than one format. (indianexpress.com) ### What is Track 1.5 versus Track 2? Track 1.5 is the halfway house — a mix of serving and retired officials, usually attending unofficially. Track 2 is looser and safer politically, because it involves retired officials, experts, and former military officers rather than current officeholders. That distinction matters here. India can keep saying formal talks are off, while still letting experienced former officials explore how to prevent the next crisis from spiraling. (bdnews24.com) ### Why would both sides want this now? Because the last crisis showed how fast escalation can happen. The four-day conflict in May 2025 involved drone and missile strikes, and relations stayed deeply damaged afterward. When official ties are dead, unofficial channels become the pressure valve. Think of them less as peace talks and more as a circuit breaker — a way to reduce the odds that the next shock becomes uncontrollable. (bdnews24.com) ### Does this mean a diplomatic thaw? Probably not — at least not yet. Nothing here suggests imminent formal negotiations, restored trust, or a political breakthrough on the big disputes. But it does suggest something more modest and still important: both sides appear to accept that complete silence is risky. In India-Pakistan terms, that alone is a meaningful shift. (bdnews24.com) The bottom line is simple. Publicly, the freeze remains. Privately, the ice may be cracking just enough for crisis-management talk. That is not peace. But it is better than two hostile states flying blind. (indianexpress.com)