Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump-Era Tariffs

The U.S. Supreme Court has reportedly struck down tariffs enacted by the Trump administration, a move with significant implications for the global market. The development was highlighted in the ITS Logistics February Supply Chain Report, which also noted easing inflation and a resilient job market.

The Supreme Court's 6-3 decision on February 20, 2026, invalidated tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977. Chief Justice John Roberts, in the majority opinion for *Learning Resources Inc. v. Trump*, stated that the law's power to "regulate…importation" does not grant the president the authority to impose taxes, a power the Constitution reserves for Congress. The ruling specifically affects the broad "reciprocal" tariffs on goods from nearly all countries and punitive tariffs against nations like China, Mexico, and Canada. However, it does not impact tariffs imposed under other laws, such as Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which covers steel and aluminum, or Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, used for tariffs on Chinese imports. In response to the ruling, President Trump immediately invoked Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 to impose a new, temporary 10% global tariff. This authority allows for a surcharge of up to 15% for a maximum of 150 days to address balance-of-payments issues. The administration has also signaled it will pursue new investigations under Sections 232 and 301 to create more durable tariffs. The question of refunds for the over $200 billion collected under the now-illegal IEEPA tariffs remains unresolved by the Supreme Court. While importers of record are expected to be entitled to refunds, the process and timing are uncertain and will likely involve further litigation in the Court of International Trade. It is considered unlikely that consumers who paid higher prices will receive direct reimbursement. Studies have indicated that U.S. importers and consumers have borne the vast majority of the cost of the tariffs. One analysis from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found that U.S. firms and consumers shouldered nearly 90% of the economic burden in 2025. The tariffs have been linked to higher prices on a wide range of goods, and their removal is anticipated to ease inflationary pressures. The decision has created significant uncertainty for international trade. Trading partners like Canada and Mexico expressed approval of the ruling, while others who had negotiated trade deals to lower the IEEPA tariffs may now face the new, temporary 10% tariff. The ongoing shifts in U.S. trade policy continue to complicate global supply chain management for businesses.

Get your own daily briefing

Scout delivers personalized news, insights, and conversations tailored to your role and industry.

Download on the App Store

Shared from Scout - Be the smartest in the room.