Protect College Sports Act advances
- Senate Republicans and Democrats circulated the finalized Protect College Sports Act this week after the Commerce Committee advanced it 19-9 on June 18. - One central provision would codify the House settlement’s revenue-sharing cap, reported at about $48.8 million with annual inflation adjustments. - The next step is a full Senate vote, after John Thune moved for cloture on Wednesday.
Senators are moving a federal college-sports bill toward a floor vote after weeks of negotiations with the NCAA, the SEC and the Big Ten. The Protect College Sports Act was advanced by the Senate Commerce Committee on June 18 by a 19-9 vote, and a finalized draft is now being circulated in the Senate ahead of the August recess. The bill would set national rules for athlete compensation, transfers, eligibility and enforcement, while giving the NCAA limited antitrust protection in specific areas. The push comes days after a federal judge’s eligibility ruling added another layer of uncertainty to roster planning for the 2026-27 school year. ### Why are lawmakers trying to pass a federal bill now? June 18 is the key date in Congress so far: that is when the Senate Commerce Committee voted 19-9 to send the bill to the full Senate. Senate Commerce leaders Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, and Maria Cantwell, a Washington Democrat, have said the measure is meant to “stabilize college sports” by writing NIL rights, scholarship protections and healthcare protections into federal law. (commerce.senate.gov) August 5 added urgency on the Senate side when Majority Leader John Thune moved for cloture, USA Today reported, putting the bill in line for a floor vote before the chamber’s recess. Deseret News reported that the finalized draft was being distributed to senators after the SEC and Big Ten, which had previously withheld support, came aboard following negotiations and concessions. (commerce.senate.gov) ### What would the bill actually do to NIL and revenue sharing? The June committee version would codify athletes’ rights to earn compensation from their name, image and likeness, while also tightening rules meant to curb pay arrangements that are not at market value, according to the Senate Commerce Committee and Deseret News. The same draft would codify the revenue-sharing cap created by the House settlement and index it upward for inflation. (usatoday.com) August 4 reporting from Deseret News said that cap would be around $48.8 million under current language. That figure has become one of the bill’s most closely watched numbers because it would help set the outer limit for direct school payments in the new compensation system, though Deseret said negotiations over specific wording were still continuing. (commerce.senate.gov) ### What else is in the Senate draft besides pay rules? The committee-backed draft would give the NCAA a limited antitrust exemption so it can enforce certain rules without immediate exposure to lawsuits, according to Deseret News and the Senate committee’s summaries. It also would limit athletes to one penalty-free transfer, cap NCAA eligibility at five years, bar former pro athletes from returning to NCAA competition, and restrict major schools from cutting women’s and Olympic sports below set baselines. (deseret.com) The Senate Commerce Committee’s Democratic release said schools with more than $80 million in athletic revenue could not reduce the number of women’s and Olympic teams they sponsor below 2024-25 levels for nine years. The committee’s Republican release said 24 conferences and 267 colleges and universities had publicly supported the bill as of June 18. (commerce.senate.gov) ### How does the judge’s eligibility ruling affect this fight? August 1 brought a separate shock from federal court in Denver, where U.S. District Judge Charlotte Sweeney ruled that athletes from the high school class of 2022 who had exhausted four seasons of eligibility could get a fifth season in 2026-27. The Associated Press reported that the ruling undercut the NCAA’s plan to apply its new “five for five” model starting with athletes who enroll in fall 2027. (commerce.senate.gov) August 3 brought a clarification from Sweeney that football players who had signed pro contracts could not use her order to return to college, but the decision still left schools weighing roster moves while the NCAA appeals. NCAA President Charlie Baker said after the initial ruling that the “chaos” from the case showed why Congress should pass the Protect College Sports Act, according to AP reporting. (nbcsports.com) ### What happens next in the Senate? Wednesday’s cloture move by Thune is the clearest marker for the next step. If the Senate invokes cloture, the bill can move toward a floor vote before the August recess; if it passes there, it would still need House action before becoming law. (fox59.com) Friday is the deadline lawmakers and college-sports officials have been watching because the Senate’s month-long August recess was set to begin then, Yahoo Sports and Deseret News reported. That timing has turned the current Senate vote count — and any final changes to the bill text — into the immediate focus for the NCAA, conferences and schools. (sports.yahoo.com) (usatoday.com)