HopeMeter poll shows 70% 'NO'

HopeMeter posted a live poll on X on May 24 asking users whether they supported Donald Trump as a leader, with the widget on the post showing “NO” ahead of “YES.” The poll appeared under the @HopeMeter account as status 2058632716271464930. The figures shown on the embedded widget listed 70% for “NO” and 29% for “YES,” alongside signal totals of $9,249 and $3,850. (x.com) ### What exactly was posted on X? The May 24 post appeared on X under @HopeMeter and carried the platform status ID 2058632716271464930. The post used a live poll-style widget asking whether users supported Trump as a leader, with two visible response options: “NO” and “YES.” The widget showed the “NO” side in front at the time reflected in the source material. (x.com) The visible percentages were 70% for “NO” and 29% for “YES.” ### What numbers were visible on the poll widget? The widget displayed not only percentages but dollar-denominated “signal” totals for each side. The figures shown were $9,249 for “NO” and $3,850 for “YES.” (x.com) Those totals were presented directly on the poll interface rather than in a separate explanatory post. The source material provided for this story identifies those amounts as the values visible on May 24. (x.com) ### Does this show a representative measure of public opinion? The X post identifies the result as a live poll on HopeMeter’s account, not as a scientific survey of U.S. voters. (x.com) The available source establishes what was displayed on the post, but it does not provide methodology, sample design, field dates beyond May 24, or weighting details that would be needed to treat it as representative polling. Because the post was hosted on X, participation depended on users who saw and engaged with that specific item. The source reviewed here confirms the existence of the post and the figures associated with it, but does not supply broader polling documentation. ### What can be verified from the post itself? The clearest verifiable details are the account name, the date, the post ID and the figures shown on the widget. (x.com) The post was associated with @HopeMeter, dated May 24, and identified by status 2058632716271464930. The same source supports the reported split of 70% “NO” to 29% “YES” and the displayed signal totals of $9,249 and $3,850. (x.com) No additional explanation of how those signal values were calculated was visible in the material reviewed for this item. ### Where can readers look for updates? The X status 2058632716271464930 under @HopeMeter is the primary place to monitor any changes to the live display, including updated percentages or signal totals. (x.com) Any follow-up explanation from HopeMeter about methodology or how the signal figures are calculated would also most likely appear on the same account.