Crypto still trades like a risk asset
Bitcoin and ether moved higher on ceasefire rumours but have shown sharp sensitivity to tariff and macro headlines, underlining that crypto remains a high‑beta risk asset rather than a stable safe haven. Analysts point to a painful Q1 for BTC and concentrated liquidations earlier in the year, while price support levels remain fragile below recent highs. (forbes.com) (finance.yahoo.com)
Bitcoin and ether rose on Monday, April 6, after reports that Iran was seeking a ceasefire in the war that had rattled markets for days. Bitcoin climbed back toward $70,000. Ether jumped more sharply. The move looked dramatic on a chart. It was also familiar. Crypto was not acting like a bunker. It was acting like a levered bet on whether investors felt brave again. That matters because crypto has spent years flirting with a different story. The sales pitch was that bitcoin might serve as digital gold, a hedge against political disorder and broken trust in governments. But the past week cut against that idea. When President Donald Trump’s tariff push flared again and broader risk markets stumbled, bitcoin fell toward $66,400 and ether and solana dropped even more. When ceasefire rumors spread, the same assets snapped higher. The trigger was not anything inside crypto. It was the same macro news driving everything else. The tariff backdrop helps explain why the swings have felt so violent. Trump’s original “Liberation Day” tariff announcement came on April 2, 2025, when he declared a national emergency on foreign trade and imposed sweeping duties on nearly every U.S. trading partner. The average effective tariff rate surged, markets fell, and a year later the policy still hangs over investors as a source of uncertainty. The Supreme Court struck down some of those tariffs in late February 2026, but the White House quickly moved to restore part of the regime through other channels. That kept the basic message intact: policy risk was back, and anything treated as a risk asset would trade like one. Bitcoin’s first quarter shows what that means in practice. By the end of March, it had logged its worst opening quarter since 2018, down roughly 22% to 24% depending on the pricing cut. Yahoo’s live quote on Monday still showed bitcoin down more than 20% year to date even after the rebound. That is not how safe havens behave. Gold does not usually lose a fifth of its value in three months because traders suddenly hate uncertainty. The uglier part sat under the surface in the derivatives market. The selloff earlier in the quarter was amplified by leverage, with long positions getting wiped out in clusters as prices fell through support. Forbes, citing Santiment and The Kobeissi Letter, described a market where long liquidations heavily outnumbered short liquidations. In plain English, too many traders had borrowed money to bet on the upside, and when prices slipped, the market forced them out all at once. That turns an ordinary drop into a trapdoor. Even the details of the rebound point the same way. On Monday, bitcoin’s rally only brought it back to levels it traded near before the latest macro shock. Yahoo Finance showed the token around $69,400 in mid-afternoon UTC, after touching about $70,040 intraday. That is a bounce, not an escape. It leaves bitcoin far below its 52-week high above $126,000, and it leaves the market arguing over whether support in the mid-$60,000s is real or just the next floor waiting to crack.