Trump arrives in Beijing to meet Xi as U.S. trade court struck down his 10% tariffs
- Donald Trump is traveling to Beijing for May 14-15 talks with Xi Jinping, days after a U.S. trade court ruled his fallback 10% tariffs illegal. - The tariff ruling hit Trump’s backup trade weapon under Section 122, but the duties still apply to most importers while appeals proceed. - That leaves Trump negotiating with China under weaker legal leverage, even as soybeans, rare earths, Iran and Taiwan crowd the agenda.
Trade is the obvious headline here. But this trip is really about leverage — and Trump is arriving in Beijing just after a court punched a hole in one of his main bargaining chips. On May 7, the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled that his fallback 10% global tariffs were unlawful. The White House appealed, and the tariffs still stand for most importers for now. But the timing is brutal, because Trump is set to meet Xi Jinping in Beijing on May 14-15 with trade, Iran, Taiwan, and supply chains all jammed into one summit. ### What changed right before the trip? Trump’s team had already lost one big tariff fight earlier this year, when the Supreme Court knocked out the broader “Liberation Day” tariffs. The 10% duties were the backup plan — a narrower global tariff built under Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act. Now that backup plan has been ruled illegal too, at least in the challenge before the trade court. The administration says it will keep fighting. (usnews.com) ### Why does that matter for Beijing? Because tariffs are not just taxes here — they are negotiating pressure. Trump is walking into talks with Xi while the legal basis for his latest tariff move is under attack. Even though the duties are still being collected from most importers during the appeal, China can see the problem clearly: Washington’s threat structure looks less solid than it did a week ago. That does not erase U.S. leverage, but it does complicate the performance of strength. (politico.com) ### What does Trump want from Xi? The short version is more Chinese restraint abroad and more Chinese buying at home. Trade is central — especially U.S. farm exports like soybeans — but the White House also wants help on the Iran crisis, including pressure on Tehran and movement around the Strait of Hormuz. Rare earths and other strategic supply chains are in the mix too, because both sides have spent years building pressure points into the relationship. (usnews.com) ### Why are soybeans always in these stories? Because soybeans are the classic fast signal in U.S.-China trade politics. China can buy or not buy, and everyone notices immediately — farmers, traders, and the White House. It is a bit like a diplomatic receipt. If Beijing wants to show goodwill without touching the hardest security issues, farm purchases are one of the easiest ways to do it. That is why agricultural exports are being watched so closely ahead of this summit. (apnews.com) ### Is this only about trade? Not even close. Iran is hanging over the whole meeting. AP’s preview says the U.S. wants China to use its influence with Tehran and help reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Taiwan is also on the agenda, along with the broader question of how the two governments keep crises from spiraling when they disagree on almost everything important. (msn.com) ### So what can Xi offer? Probably selective wins, not a grand bargain. China can offer atmospherics, some purchases, maybe calmer language, maybe limited cooperation on crisis management. But the harder disputes — industrial policy, tech controls, Taiwan, and long-term strategic rivalry — do not disappear because two presidents sit down for two days in Beijing. That is the catch. (apnews.com) ### What should people watch first? Watch for specifics, not ceremony. A soybean buying commitment matters more than warm photos. Any statement on rare earths matters more than vague talk about stability. And any sign that China will help on Iran would be a real shift, because that issue reaches far beyond the usual trade-war script. (csis.org) ### Bottom line? Trump is going to Beijing needing a win. But he is going after one just as a U.S. court weakened the legal footing of his latest tariff strategy. That does not kill the summit. It just means the meeting is less about brute pressure now, and more about whether either side wants a limited deal badly enough to fake momentum — or make some. (usnews.com) (apnews.com)