Binance Cleared in Terrorism Lawsuit
A U.S. Federal Court has dismissed all claims against crypto exchange Binance in an anti-terrorism lawsuit. The court rejected allegations that the company assisted or conspired with terrorists, marking a decisive legal victory for the firm.
The lawsuit, brought by 535 plaintiffs, alleged that Binance had provided material support related to 64 terrorist attacks. U.S. District Judge Jeannette Vargas in Manhattan dismissed the claims, stating the plaintiffs failed to show that Binance and its founder, Changpeng Zhao, had associated themselves with the attacks or participated in them. In a detailed 62-page decision, the court found the connection between Binance and the alleged terrorist organizations was limited to the use of its platform for transactions, which does not constitute intentional collaboration. The judge characterized the plaintiffs' 891-page complaint as "wholly unnecessary" but has allowed them 60 days to refile an amended case with more substantial allegations. This civil lawsuit's dismissal is distinct from Binance's major 2023 settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice. In that case, the company pleaded guilty and paid a $4.3 billion fine for violations of the Bank Secrecy Act, including failures in its anti-money laundering program and for operating an unlicensed money transmitting business. As part of the 2023 settlement, founder Changpeng Zhao stepped down as CEO and paid a $50 million fine. That case revolved around Binance's failure to report over 100,000 suspicious transactions involving organizations like Hamas, as well as ransomware and child sexual exploitation materials. The court in the recently dismissed terrorism case made a clear distinction between potential compliance failures and the intentional support of terrorism, finding no evidence of the latter. Binance's General Counsel, Eleanor Hughes, called the dismissal a "complete vindication of all false allegations." Despite this victory, Binance continues to navigate significant regulatory scrutiny worldwide. The company has faced legal challenges and has been barred from operating in several countries. In a separate matter, 11 U.S. Democratic Senators have urged the Department of Justice and the Treasury to investigate the company for allegedly facilitating $1.7 billion in transactions with entities linked to Iran.