Study: 50-Point Trust Gap in Healthcare AI Between Users and Non-Users

A new study reveals a significant trust divide regarding the use of AI in healthcare. Research from Reach3 Insights and Rival Technologies found that 88% of current users trust AI in a healthcare context, compared to only 38% of non-users. Overall trust in healthcare AI among the general American population has fallen to 44%, highlighting the challenge of public perception and adoption.

- A key factor in the trust gap is the concern over data privacy and security, as many patients worry about who has access to their health data and how it might be used. A 2025 report indicated that 81% of data policy violations in healthcare organizations involved regulated data like protected health information (PHI). - The integration of AI with existing healthcare infrastructure, such as Electronic Health Records (EHRs), presents significant technical challenges. Many legacy EHR systems were not designed for AI integration, leading to issues with data silos and a lack of interoperability that can hinder the effectiveness of AI tools. - From a clinical perspective, barriers to AI adoption include a lack of training, the high cost of implementation, and resistance to change among healthcare professionals. A survey of physicians in Saudi Arabia revealed that while over 82% trusted AI-based clinical decision-making, only about 26% had actually used AI in the past year. - Patient fears about AI in healthcare often center on the potential for misdiagnosis, less time with their doctors, and increased costs. Furthermore, a study published in *JAMA Network Open* found that 65.8% of U.S. adults have low trust in their healthcare system's ability to use AI responsibly. - The study by Reach3 Insights and Rival Technologies utilized a conversational, mobile-first research approach to gather quantitative and qualitative data, including video responses, from a nationally representative sample of Americans. This methodology is designed to uncover the motivations and concerns that shape public trust in healthcare AI. - Regulatory frameworks for AI in healthcare are still evolving, creating uncertainty for both developers and healthcare organizations. In the U.S., the FDA has issued draft guidance for AI-enabled medical devices, emphasizing the need for safety, transparency, and real-world performance monitoring. - One of the top health technology hazards for 2025 is the risks associated with AI-enabled health technologies, according to ECRI, a global healthcare safety nonprofit. The organization warns that AI systems can produce false or misleading results and may perpetuate biases present in their training data. - A significant portion of healthcare professionals, 71%, still use personal AI accounts for work, which often do not meet HIPAA compliance standards, posing a risk of privacy violations. This highlights a gap in organizational governance and training regarding the safe use of AI tools.

Get your own daily briefing

Scout delivers personalized news, insights, and conversations tailored to your role and industry.

Download on the App Store

Shared from Scout - Be the smartest in the room.