Nithya Raman floats barbecue ban

- Los Angeles mayoral candidate Nithya Raman drew criticism on May 13 after a City Council motion she co-authored raised restricting outdoor barbecues on red-flag days. - The most disputed line told residents in red-flag areas to cease fire-risk activities “such as use of outdoor barbecues or fire pits.” - Los Angeles departments are expected to report back on red-flag protocols after the council approved the broader preparedness motion May 13.

Los Angeles City Council member Nithya Raman is taking heat in the city’s mayoral race after a wildfire-preparedness motion she co-authored included language telling residents in red-flag areas to stop using outdoor barbecues and fire pits. The dispute broke into the campaign in the days after the council approved a broader fire-safety package on May 13. Critics cast the proposal as a backyard barbecue ban. Supporters and city reporting around the vote show the underlying motion was part of a larger effort to tighten rules during dangerous wind events after January’s fires. ### Did Raman actually propose banning backyard barbecues? A January 14, 2025 motion introduced by Raman and Councilmember Katy Yaroslavsky sought to expand Los Angeles’ red-flag warning system after windstorms and wildfires exposed gaps in the city’s emergency response, according to Raman’s office. The motion said the city needed more proactive restrictions in very high fire hazard areas during National Weather Service red-flag warnings and particularly dangerous situations. (cd4.lacity.gov) Raman’s office later described the proposal in a newsletter as including “notification to all residents in Red Flag warning areas to cease all outdoor activities that increase risk of fire, such as use of outdoor barbecues or fire pits.” That language is the basis for the current backlash. ### What was the broader policy package about? Los Angeles officials framed the motion as a wider preparedness plan, not a stand-alone grilling measure. (cd4.lacity.gov) Raman’s office said the package also called for temporary park closures in high-risk areas, suspension of construction, debris hauling and film permits, and increased fines for violating existing or future red-flag ordinances. MyNewsLA reported on May 13 that the City Council approved the broader motion while carving out some exemptions for outdoor barbecuing. (cd4.lacity.gov) That suggests the final council action was narrower than the version critics highlighted in campaign attacks and commentary pieces. ### Why did barbecues become the flashpoint? Monica Rodriguez, another Los Angeles council member, publicly objected to the barbecue language as the council considered the package. (cd4.lacity.gov) Accounts of her remarks quoted her as saying the idea would “unfairly target neighborhood gatherings and long-standing community traditions” and that “the last thing Angelenos need is a ban on hosting a carne asada in their own backyards.” (mynewsla.com) Fox-linked and other politically aligned outlets then elevated that dispute into a campaign issue for Raman, who is running for mayor. Spencer Pratt, identified in multiple reports as a rival candidate, also seized on the issue on social media and in commentary criticizing the proposal. ### What is a red-flag day in Los Angeles? (diningandcooking.com) The Los Angeles Fire Department says a red-flag day is declared when weather conditions create extremely high potential for a fast-moving brush fire. The department defines those conditions as wind speeds of 25 mph or more and humidity of 15% or less. Ready LA County uses similar thresholds, saying red-flag conditions generally mean humidity below 15% and winds above 25 mph. The practical point of Raman’s motion was to add more formal restrictions and public warnings during those periods. (diningandcooking.com) ### Was this about California statewide policy? The fight was local, not statewide. The proposal concerned Los Angeles city red-flag protocols and emerged from city officials’ response to wildfire risk in hillside neighborhoods and parks, according to Raman’s office and local coverage of the council vote. (lafd.org) California’s broader wildfire politics helped amplify it. (ready.lacounty.gov) Reports tied the controversy to a mayoral campaign already shaped by fire response, public safety and recovery after destructive fires earlier in 2025. That context made a technical emergency-management measure easier for opponents to turn into a kitchen-table issue. That is an inference based on the timing of the campaign coverage and the council debate. (cd4.lacity.gov) ### What happens next? The May 13 council action directed Los Angeles departments to keep working on enhanced red-flag protocols, according to local coverage and Raman’s office. The next concrete step is a city report or follow-up recommendations on how those warning-day restrictions should be implemented and what exemptions remain. (cd4.lacity.gov) The mayoral campaign will likely keep pressing the issue before the next debates and candidate appearances. For the underlying policy, the key documents remain Raman’s January 14, 2025 motion announcement, her office’s post-fire newsletter, and the City Council’s May 13 action on red-flag preparedness. (cd4.lacity.gov) (mynewsla.com)

Get your own daily briefing

Scout delivers personalized news, insights, and conversations tailored to your role and industry.

Download on the App Store

Shared from Scout - Be the smartest in the room.