Brent tops $92 a barrel
- Brent crude traded above $100 on May 22 as shipping disruptions in the Gulf and Red Sea kept energy markets focused on supply risks. - The Strait of Hormuz had been carrying about 20 million barrels a day before flows fell to a trickle, the IEA said in March. - In the next few days, investors are watching U.S.-Iran talks and any move by shippers or Gulf producers.
Brent crude’s move is the clearest market signal in this story, but oil is only the first place the shock shows up. By late May, traders were still pricing in the risk that supply through the Gulf could remain constrained even as Washington and Tehran pursued diplomacy. The pressure is coming from two waterways at once: the Strait of Hormuz, which handles a large share of the world’s oil exports, and the Red Sea, where attacks on commercial shipping have kept many carriers on longer and costlier routes. The result is a supply-chain problem that starts with crude and refined fuels and then spreads into freight, petrochemicals and factory inputs. The Hill reported on May 23 that President Donald Trump was under pressure to reopen Hormuz as U.S. gasoline prices rose and jet-fuel shortages worsened ahead of Memorial Day weekend. The International Energy Agency said in its March oil market report that crude and oil-product flows through Hormuz had plunged from about 20 million barrels a day before the war to a trickle. (thehill.com) ### Why does a move in Brent matter beyond oil traders? Brent is the global benchmark that helps set prices for much of the crude traded outside the United States. When Brent rises on geopolitical risk, importers, refiners, airlines and shipping companies all face higher input costs, even before any physical shortage reaches them. Reuters reported on May 12 that HSBC had raised its 2026 average Brent forecast to $95 a barrel because it expected a longer effective closure of Hormuz. (thehill.com) May 22 pricing underscored that tension. Market data published by the Financial Times and Forbes Advisor showed Brent above $104 a barrel at the end of the week, well above the “about $92” level cited in the preliminary card. That means the price shock had not only arrived but had moved further by the time of publication. (money.usnews.com) ### What are Hormuz and the Red Sea doing to the same supply chain? The Strait of Hormuz is the narrower and more important energy chokepoint. The IEA said in March that the war had created the largest supply disruption in the history of the global oil market, with Gulf producers cutting output as exports stalled and only limited capacity available to bypass the waterway. (forbes.com) The Red Sea is a different problem: it is less about crude volumes than about shipping reliability. Lloyd’s List reported this month that Bab el-Mandeb traffic remained far below pre-crisis levels and that carriers were still treating the route as a war-risk zone. Another Lloyd’s List analysis said Red Sea crude tanker transits had recovered in some segments, but container shipping had not returned to normal patterns. (iea.blob.core.windows.net) ### Why are airlines and manufacturers getting pulled in? Jet fuel is one of the first refined products to tighten when crude supply is disrupted and shipping routes lengthen. The Hill said worsening jet-fuel shortages were part of the pressure on the White House as higher energy costs fed into inflation and consumer prices. Gregory Brew of Eurasia Group told The Hill that markets had responded negatively to the continued status quo, while diplomacy had offered only limited relief. (lloydslist.com) Naphtha is the next link in the chain. Naphtha is a feedstock used to make plastics, chemicals and other industrial materials, so shortages hit factories before they show up on store shelves. The New York Times reported on May 24 that a naphtha shortage tied to the Hormuz blockade was disrupting manufacturing and retail-goods production in Japan and South Korea, extending the Gulf shock into Asian industry. (thehill.com) ### What are markets waiting for now? Marco Rubio said on May 23 that the United States was waiting for Tehran’s response to the administration’s latest peace terms and that there had been “a little bit of movement,” according to The Hill. The same report said Trump had convened senior national-security officials as Axios reported he was considering renewed airstrikes if talks stalled. (lloydslist.com) The next market test is straightforward. In the coming days, traders will watch for a U.S.-Iran agreement, any change in vessel traffic through Hormuz and the Red Sea, and fresh guidance from banks and agencies including the IEA and major oil forecasters. (thehill.com)