Lalit Modi quantifies IPL loss

Lalit Modi has argued the IPL’s current 74‑match schedule leaves about Rs 2,400 crore of media‑rights revenue unrealised and has renewed calls for format changes to capture that value. His numerical claim reframes fixture design as a revenue and inventory problem — more matches mean more venue days, broadcast windows and sponsor inventory but also greater logistical burden (economictimes.indiatimes.com).

Lalit Modi says the Indian Premier League is leaving about Rs 2,400 crore on the table every season by stopping at 74 matches instead of adding roughly 20 more games. His argument turns a cricket schedule into a simple inventory equation: every extra match creates one more television slot, one more digital stream, one more stadium date, and one more bundle of sponsor space. (financialexpress.com) (iplt20.com) That claim is built on the price the Board of Control for Cricket in India already locked in when it sold Indian Premier League media rights for 2023 through 2027. In June 2022, the league announced a cumulative rights value of Rs 48,390.32 crore for that five-season cycle. (iplt20.com) Spread across 410 matches in that rights package, the media deal works out to about Rs 118 crore per game. Add 20 matches at that rate and the unrealised value comes to about Rs 2,360.5 crore, which is the math behind Modi’s rounded Rs 2,400 crore figure. (news18.com) (timesofsports.com) (iplt20.com) The immediate backdrop is the league’s present size. The official 2025 schedule announced by the Board of Control for Cricket in India kept the tournament at 74 matches across 13 venues, running from March 22, 2025 to May 25, 2025. (iplt20.com) That 74-match format matters because the league now has 10 teams, which creates a structural compromise. A full double round-robin, where every team plays every other team home and away, would require 90 league-stage matches before playoffs, but the current system uses a grouped schedule to stay shorter. (financialexpress.com) Modi’s complaint is that the shortened format breaks from the commercial promise he says the competition was originally designed to deliver. In his telling, a 10-team league should be selling a fuller home-and-away map, because that gives franchises more home dates and broadcasters more premium evening windows. (financialexpress.com) The economics of that are straightforward even before ticket sales enter the picture. A cricket match is not just 40 overs of play; it is also several hours of advertising inventory, branded segments, pre-match and post-match programming, hospitality packages, local sponsorship activations, and merchandising opportunities tied to one fixed date. (financialexpress.com) (iplt20.com) That is why schedule design in a league like the Indian Premier League behaves a lot like shelf space in a supermarket. If you have a product that already sells at around Rs 118 crore a slot in media value, leaving 20 slots unused looks less like restraint and more like unsold stock. (iplt20.com) (timesofsports.com) But the Board of Control for Cricket in India has reasons to keep the calendar tighter. More matches would mean a longer tournament, more travel days, more pressure on stadium operations, more strain on players who also serve their national teams, and a bigger squeeze on the international cricket calendar. (financialexpress.com) The rights package itself shows that expansion was once part of the planning logic. Reporting around the 2023 to 2027 tender said the five-year cycle was structured for 410 matches in total, with annual seasons rising from 74 to 84 and then 94 games, even though the league has not yet moved to those larger totals in practice. (ndtv.com) (timesofsports.com) That gap between contracted capacity and actual scheduling is what gives Modi’s criticism its force. He is not arguing that the league needs demand it does not have; he is arguing that the demand was already priced, sold, and validated by broadcasters willing to pay one of the highest per-match rates in world sport. (iplt20.com) (espncricinfo.com) The debate now is less about whether extra matches would make money and more about who absorbs the cost of creating them. Broadcasters and sponsors would get more inventory, franchises would get more home dates and likely more revenue share, while administrators would have to solve the harder problems of logistics, workload, venue availability, and calendar congestion. (financialexpress.com) (iplt20.com) So Modi’s Rs 2,400 crore line is really a challenge to the league’s current philosophy. If the Indian Premier League remains at 74 matches, it is choosing a shorter, more manageable tournament over a larger annual business, and his calculation puts a price on that choice. (financialexpress.com) (iplt20.com)

Get your own daily briefing

Scout delivers personalized news, insights, and conversations tailored to your role and industry.

Download on the App Store

Shared from Scout - Be the smartest in the room.