Myanmar courts ASEAN
Myanmar’s newly installed president, Min Aung Hlaing, used his inaugural address to promise democracy, peace and a friendlier climate for foreign investment as he seeks regional acceptance. That pitch has already split opinion: some ASEAN members are weighing whether engagement will moderate the junta, while rights advocates and Rohingya campaigners are urging regional leaders to resist normalisation. (timesofindia.indiatimes.com) (foreignpolicy.com) (manilatimes.net)
Min Aung Hlaing used his first speech as Myanmar’s president on April 10 to promise “democracy,” “peace,” foreign investment and better ties with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, the 10-country bloc that has kept Myanmar at arm’s length since the 2021 coup. He made the pitch in parliament after moving from junta chief into the presidency. (thestar.com.my) That office change matters because the man did not change. Min Aung Hlaing is the same general who seized power from Aung San Suu Kyi’s elected government in February 2021, a move that triggered civil war, mass displacement and years of diplomatic isolation. (foreignpolicy.com) The club he is trying to re-enter has one standing rulebook for Myanmar: the Five-Point Consensus that Association of Southeast Asian Nations leaders agreed in April 2021. It calls for an immediate end to violence, dialogue among all parties, a special envoy, humanitarian aid and an envoy visit to meet all sides. (asean.org) Myanmar never delivered those terms, and the bloc kept punishing it in a very Southeast Asian way: by barring its ruling generals from top-level summits while still leaving the country inside the organization. Association of Southeast Asian Nations leaders said again in October 2025 that violence against civilians continued and that the Five-Point Consensus remained the main framework. (asean.org) Now the split inside the bloc is getting harder to hide. Foreign Policy reported on April 9 that some governments see Min Aung Hlaing’s formal presidency as a reason to test re-engagement, while others still view normalization as rewarding a military takeover that never produced an inclusive political process. (foreignpolicy.com) The Philippines has already signaled one version of that softer line. Manila said on April 4 that it would continue engaging Myanmar after Min Aung Hlaing’s election as president, showing how some capitals are separating day-to-day diplomacy from the question of political legitimacy. (thestar.com.my) Thailand has gone even further in tone. The Irrawaddy reported on April 9 that Thai leader Anutin Charnvirakul became the first leader from the Association of Southeast Asian Nations to congratulate Min Aung Hlaing on his appointment, a symbolic step because Thailand shares a long border, cross-border trade and refugee pressure with Myanmar. (irrawaddy.com) Opponents of normalization are trying to raise the cost before that drift becomes policy. Rohingya advocate Yasmin Ullah, one of 11 plaintiffs in a genocide complaint filed in Indonesia, urged the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and the Muslim world this week to oppose the junta rather than treat a new title as a new government. (manilatimes.net) That Indonesia case matters because Indonesian courts can hear some grave-crimes cases under universal jurisdiction, which is legal shorthand for prosecuting certain alleged atrocities no matter where they happened. The complaint targets Min Aung Hlaing over abuses against the Rohingya, the mostly Muslim minority driven out in huge numbers during the military’s 2017 campaign. (manilatimes.net) So Myanmar’s new sales pitch is colliding with Myanmar’s old record. If more neighbors decide that a suit and a presidential oath are enough to reopen the door, Min Aung Hlaing gets the regional legitimacy he has wanted since 2021 without first meeting the bloc’s own conditions on violence, dialogue and access. (foreignpolicy.com)