Trading Firm Warns of Market 'Structural Decay'

Brian Ferdinand of EverForward Trading stated that the dominant threat to trading firms in 2026 is no longer explosive volatility but rather "structural decay." The firm's new risk framework addresses systemic frictions like fragmenting liquidity, unstable correlations, and widening execution slippage. This environment is characterized by constant market access but unreliable structural integrity.

- Slippage, the difference between the expected and actual execution price of a trade, is a key component of structural decay and is most common during high market volatility or in markets with low liquidity. Factors contributing to it include delays in order execution and the use of market orders, which prioritize speed over a guaranteed price. - Market fragmentation, where trading of a single asset is split across numerous venues, can lead to higher search costs and uncertainty in execution, even as it drives down explicit costs like trading fees. This division of liquidity is driven by regulatory changes, such as MiFID in Europe, and the proliferation of alternative trading systems. - Correlations between different assets can become unstable, particularly during periods of market stress, undermining quantitative strategies that rely on historical relationships for diversification or pairs trading. This instability means that assets expected to move in opposition can start moving together, removing hedging benefits when they are most needed. - The concept of structural decay is also applied to volatility-linked products like VIX exchange-traded notes (ETNs), which can systematically lose value over time due to the mechanics of their underlying futures contracts, a process known as contango. - The shift toward real-time and T+1 settlement cycles, while aimed at reducing counterparty risk, can impact liquidity by eliminating the risk-mitigating benefits of end-of-day multilateral netting. Without netting, which reduces the value of payments that need to be exchanged by an average of 98-99%, firms must pre-fund a much larger volume of transactions, tying up capital. - Large Language Models (LLMs) and other AI tools are being developed to counteract market structure issues by providing deeper analysis of unstructured data for alpha generation, detecting trading anomalies, and optimizing trade execution pathways to minimize slippage. These models can also simulate market scenarios to stress-test strategies against structural breakdowns. - For fintech product builders, the challenges of structural decay create opportunities to develop new tools for institutional clients and hedge funds. Go-to-market strategies for such products often focus on demonstrating a clear return on investment through improved execution quality, better risk management, or access to previously hidden liquidity pools. - Brian Ferdinand's firm, EverForward Trading, focuses on creating durable, systematic trading systems designed to withstand market regime changes by separating research from execution and prioritizing long-term model robustness over short-term optimization. His public commentary emphasizes an "architecture-first" approach to trading system design as a response to degrading market conditions.

Get your own daily briefing

Scout delivers personalized news, insights, and conversations tailored to your role and industry.

Download on the App Store

Shared from Scout - Be the smartest in the room.