RBI may add an hour delay
The Reserve Bank is considering a one‑hour pause on large digital transfers as an anti‑fraud measure, which could slow certain checkout flows. The proposal being discussed would apply to transactions above about ₹10,000 and includes trusted‑person authentication for seniors to interrupt instant fraud chains (economictimes.indiatimes.com). If implemented, that delay would introduce fresh friction into impulse or trust‑based purchases and affect higher average‑order‑value local commerce use cases (economictimes.indiatimes.com).
India’s central bank is weighing a rule that would make some digital payments stop being truly instant: transfers above ₹10,000 could sit for one hour before they go through. The proposal is aimed at fraud cases where a scammer keeps a victim on the phone and rushes them into sending money before anyone can think twice. (economictimes.indiatimes.com) The bank discussing this is the Reserve Bank of India, and the payment rail in question is the Unified Payments Interface, the system Indians use for bank-to-bank transfers inside apps like PhonePe, Google Pay, and Paytm. Unified Payments Interface is built around speed, so a forced pause would change the basic promise people are used to. (rbi.org.in) (npci.org.in) The draft under discussion is narrower than “all digital payments.” Economic Times reported that it would target account-to-account transfers above ₹10,000 made by individuals, sole proprietors, and partnership firms, especially where there is no chargeback path after a fraud. (economictimes.indiatimes.com) That detail matters because a card payment and a direct bank transfer do not behave the same way after a scam. If money moves straight from one bank account to another and is quickly withdrawn or layered through other accounts, recovery gets much harder than in systems with formal reversal or chargeback mechanisms. (economictimes.indiatimes.com) (upihelp.npci.org.in) The Reserve Bank is also discussing a “trusted person” check for senior citizens and people with disabilities. That would let a pre-chosen family member or helper act like a second set of eyes before a suspicious transfer is completed. (economictimes.indiatimes.com) Another idea on the table is a “kill switch” for digital payments. In plain terms, that means a customer who realizes something is wrong could hit an emergency brake and try to stop further payment activity before a fraud chain spreads across multiple transactions. (economictimes.indiatimes.com) This is happening because India’s payment system got enormous very fast. The National Payments Corporation of India says Unified Payments Interface now processes billions of transactions a month, and the Reserve Bank’s recent payments report says the system has reshaped everyday commerce from street vendors to bill payments. (npci.org.in) (rbi.org.in) The same speed that makes a ₹40 tea payment effortless also helps fraudsters with larger sums. A scam works best when the victim is hurried, isolated, and told to act “right now,” so a one-hour wait is designed to break that script rather than to catch every fake transaction with software alone. (economictimes.indiatimes.com) If the rule is adopted, the friction will land hardest on high-value purchases that currently rely on instant trust. A furniture order, a jeweler payment, a contractor advance, or a local merchant checkout above ₹10,000 could suddenly feel less like tapping a button and more like waiting for a bank transfer to clear. (economictimes.indiatimes.com) The proposal is not final yet. Economic Times reported that comments on the paper are open until May 8, 2026, and the Reserve Bank is still deciding whether the delay would happen at the sender’s bank, the receiver’s bank, or both ends of the transaction. (economictimes.indiatimes.com) If India goes ahead, it will be making a deliberate trade: less speed for some payments in exchange for a better chance to stop panic-driven fraud before the money disappears. For a system built on “instant means instant,” even a one-hour pause would be a major design change. (economictimes.indiatimes.com)