Police Association Backs ICE Protection Act

The National Police Association has officially endorsed the ICE Protection Act of 2026. The group cited a DHS report on the increasing use of vehicles as weapons against Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers during protests as the reason for backing calls for enhanced legal protections.

The ICE Protection Act of 2026, introduced by Senator John Cornyn (TX) and several Republican cosponsors, aims to significantly increase penalties for assaulting federal law enforcement officers with a vehicle. The bill proposes doubling the maximum prison term from 20 to 40 years for using a dangerous weapon to assault an officer and introduces mandatory minimum sentences of five to ten years specifically for using a vehicle in such an attack, with the length of the sentence depending on the severity of the officer's injuries. The push for this legislation comes after a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) report highlighted a dramatic increase in vehicular assaults against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers. According to the report, these types of attacks surged by 3,200% over the past year, a statistic proponents of the bill cite as evidence of the growing dangers faced by ICE agents. This bill is part of a larger legislative effort to increase protections for law enforcement. Other proposed legislation includes the "Protect and Serve Act" and the "Justice for Fallen Law Enforcement Act," which also seek to create stronger federal penalties for individuals who target officers. These efforts are supported by law enforcement groups like the National Association of Police Organizations and the Fraternal Order of Police. The proposed act and the increased enforcement it represents are not without significant opposition. Civil liberties and immigrant advocacy organizations have been vocal in their criticism of what they describe as ICE's "unprecedented assault on our rights, safety, and democratic way of life." Groups like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) argue that providing additional funding and protections for ICE, without meaningful accountability measures, will only embolden the agency to continue what they deem to be widespread abuses and violence. Critics point to a pattern of aggressive tactics by ICE agents, which they claim creates an atmosphere of fear in immigrant communities and erodes trust in local law enforcement. There have been calls from some members of Congress to reject any increased funding for ICE and to implement "guardrails" to prevent what they term "lawless" and "dangerous" operations. In some states, local lawmakers have attempted to pass legislation to regulate the conduct of ICE officers and limit cooperation between local police and federal immigration authorities. These efforts reflect a broader national debate over the role and methods of ICE, with some activists and politicians calling for the agency to be dismantled or abolished. The ICE Accountability Act has also been introduced in the Senate, which would establish an independent watchdog to oversee the agency.

Get your own daily briefing

Scout delivers personalized news, insights, and conversations tailored to your role and industry.

Download on the App Store

Shared from Scout - Be the smartest in the room.