Angel investing: power‑law notes
Recent social threads reiterate the power‑law reality for angels — many startups fail, with posters suggesting 65–75% zeros and recommending 30–50 checks to find winners. (x.com) The same mood points to larger market flows: Q1 VC was noted as up sharply, with figures like $300B cited for broader activity and an AI share of that growth. (x.com)
Angel investing is a hits business: most startup checks lose money, and a small number of outliers drive most returns. (angellist.com) AngelList said early-stage venture returns follow an “extreme power law,” meaning a few very large winners skew overall performance. In a separate analysis, AngelList said investing in more startups can raise expected returns because the median startup outcome is far below the mean. (angellist.com) AngelList also reported that failed startup investments typically wipe out most or all of the original principal, while the rare winners can return many times the initial check. That is the math behind advice from many experienced angels to build portfolios with dozens of positions instead of making a handful of concentrated bets. (angellist.com) The public market for startup funding got larger and more concentrated in the first quarter of 2026. PitchBook and the National Venture Capital Association said United States venture deal value reached $267.2 billion in the quarter, while exit value hit a record $347.3 billion. (pitchbook.com) Those headline numbers were heavily shaped by a few giant transactions. PitchBook and the National Venture Capital Association said that if the five largest deals and exits are excluded, first-quarter deal value falls 73.2% and exit value falls 86.6%. (nvca.org) Crunchbase said global venture funding reached about $300 billion across roughly 6,000 startups in the first quarter of 2026, up more than 150% from both the prior quarter and a year earlier. Crunchbase said the surge was driven by spending on artificial intelligence computing and frontier-model companies. (crunchbase.com) Crunchbase said a handful of large United States artificial intelligence companies captured the bulk of that money even as global deal count fell. In a separate 2026 analysis, Crunchbase said capital was concentrating into “a select few companies and a single industry.” (crunchbase.com) That backdrop helps explain why angels keep talking about portfolio size. When more venture dollars pool into a smaller number of giant winners, missing one outlier can matter more than being right on several smaller investments. (angellist.com) The tension is that a record funding quarter does not mean broad startup health. PitchBook and the National Venture Capital Association said experienced firms captured 90.9% of capital raised in first-quarter 2026, the highest share on record in that dataset. (nvca.org) For new angels, the lesson is mechanical rather than philosophical: one or two startup bets are usually not enough to test the model. In a market where giant winners are rarer than failures and capital is clustering around a few companies, diversification is the strategy, not a side note. (angellist.com)