Rare‑earth leverage fading
- Analysts say rare‑earth export restrictions will lose strategic leverage as Western supply diversification progresses. (x.com) - The estimate given was roughly an 18‑month window for Western diversification to mitigate leverage. (x.com) - That timetable implies countries are building alternate supply chains and cutting China's momentary choke points. (x.com)
China still dominates rare earths, but analysts and policymakers increasingly describe its export curbs as a shrinking lever as the United States, Europe, Australia and Japan build backup supply chains. (iea.org) Rare earths are a group of 17 metals used in permanent magnets, which sit inside electric-vehicle motors, wind turbines, data centers and many weapons systems. In 2024, China accounted for about 60% of mined output, 91% of separation and refining, and 94% of sintered permanent magnet production, according to the International Energy Agency. (iea.org) Beijing tightened control in April 2025 by requiring export licenses for seven medium and heavy rare earth elements, including dysprosium and terbium, plus related oxides, alloys and compounds. Companies without licenses risk having shipments held at Chinese customs. (taylorwessing.com) The immediate choke point is not the ore in the ground. It is the middle of the chain — the chemical separation, refining and magnet-making that turn rock into industrial parts. (spglobal.com) That is where the response has accelerated over the past year. JPMorgan said in an April 2026 report that “global diversification has begun,” with governments and companies moving from identifying the risk to financing processing, refining and recycling capacity outside China. (jpmorganchase.com) The new build-out is visible in specific projects. MP Materials said in January 2025 that its Fort Worth, Texas, facility had started commercial production of neodymium-praseodymium metal and trial production of automotive-grade neodymium-iron-boron magnets. (mpmaterials.com) Australia’s Lynas, the largest rare-earth producer outside China, reported A$265 million in quarterly revenue on April 20, 2026, and said customers were seeking to reduce reliance on Chinese supply. Australia’s government has also made critical minerals a formal industrial priority under its 2023–2030 strategy. (usnews.com) (industry.gov.au) Europe has written diversification targets into law. The European Union’s Critical Raw Materials Act, in force since May 23, 2024, aims by 2030 to keep the bloc from relying on a single third country for more than 65% of any strategic raw material at any relevant stage of processing. (commission.europa.eu) Washington is also paying to shorten the timeline. The U.S. Department of Energy opened a funding round worth up to $134 million in December 2025 for projects that recover, refine and process rare earth elements from domestic sources, including waste streams. (energy.gov) None of that means the pressure is gone. S&P Global said in January 2026 that bottlenecks in heavy rare earths were likely to persist through 2026, and JPMorgan said it would take several years before concentration risk was “meaningfully reduced.” (spglobal.com) (jpmorganchase.com) The shift is narrower than full independence and more practical than that. If enough non-Chinese refining, magnet production and recycling comes online over the next 18 months to few years, export controls become less a chokehold and more a temporary disruption. (jpmorganchase.com)