House Republicans split on DHS funding
- House Republicans broke their floor freeze Wednesday, passing a Section 702 renewal and a 215-211 budget resolution after hours of internal revolt. - The budget vote stayed open more than five hours, and the FISA bill passed 235-191 after leaders flipped conservatives like Andy Biggs. - The split matters because DHS has been partially shut down for about 75 days, with TSA and Secret Service funding now running short.
House Republicans did finally move on Homeland Security funding this week. But the real story is how messy the path was. Speaker Mike Johnson had to drag two separate priorities — renewing the government’s Section 702 surveillance power and advancing a budget plan tied to DHS money — through a conference that kept threatening to blow up both. By late Wednesday, the House had passed each piece. The catch is that neither vote made the underlying Republican split disappear. (nbcnews.com) ### What actually got through? Two things. First, the House voted 235-191 to renew Section 702 of FISA for three years. Then it voted 215-211 to adopt the Senate-passed budget resolution that opens the door to a party-line package with up to roughly $75 billion for immigration enforcement agencies like ICE and Border Patrol. That second vote is the one Republicans see as the path to ending the long DHS funding lapse. (nbcnews.com) ### Why were Republicans fighting each other? Because this was never just one fight. Hard-right members were angry about the FISA deal, especially because leadership would not attach every conservative demand to it. Another bloc hated parts of the farm bill. Others disliked using the Senate’s narrower(nbcnews.com)e at once with a 217-212 style margin that leaves almost no room for defectors. (politico.com) ### Why did FISA get tangled up in DHS? Leverage, basically. The same tiny Republican majority had to clear the procedural rule for FISA, the farm bill and the budget resolution together. So members who wanted concessions on one issue used the others as hostages. That is why a dispute over surveillance law and a dispute over ethanol sales could both end up delaying a vote about Homeland Security funding. (politico.com) ### How bad did the floor chaos get? Bad enough that a routine step turned into a public endurance test. A procedural vote was held open for about two hours while Johnson worked the floor. The later budget vote stayed open for more than five hours. Republicans eventually flipped enough(politico.com)leadership surviving one defection at a time. (nbcnews.com) ### Does this end the DHS shutdown? Not yet. The House budget vote only unlocks the reconciliation process for a later bill. It does not itself fund the department. Republicans are trying a two-step plan: first approve the budget framework, then write the actual package to send to Trump by June 1. So the immediate crisis eased politically, but the shutdown does not vanish until the follow-on legislation passes. (politico.com) ### Why is the pressure rising now? Because the shutdown has dragged on for roughly 75 days, and the White House says money to pay TSA, Secret Service and other DHS personnel will soon run out. More than 1,100 TSA workers have already quit during the lapse, and replacements take months to train. That turns an internal House fight in(politico.com)rain. (usnews.com) ### What is still unresolved? The Senate still has to deal with the House-passed FISA bill, and that measure carries baggage of its own. Senate Republicans have signaled resistance to the House version because it includes an unrelated ban on a central bank digital currency. On DHS, House Republicans still need to turn the budget authority they just won into an actual funding bill that can survive their own conference. (politico.com) ### Bottom line Johnson got the House unstuck for a day. But he did it by stitching together a temporary truce, not by solving the party’s argument. That matters because the next DHS funding bill will run through the same narrow majority, the same factions and the same habit of turning every vote into a leverage play. (politico.com)