Curve Resupply case in court
The legal dispute over Curve Finance’s $9.3 million Resupply exploit has moved into Singapore courts, highlighting persistent uncertainty over protocol liability in post‑exploit recoveries. The case underscores that legal avenues are increasingly the battleground for capital recovery after DeFi exploits. (dlnews.com)
A Singapore judge on March 27, 2026 ordered two individuals to cease harassing Curve contributor Haowi Wong. (finance.yahoo.com) Court documents say the online campaign included posts on X and private group chats that accused Wong and linked Curve to the Resupply incident that occurred in June 2025. (binance.com) Post‑exploit forensic reports describe the attack as a “donation” exploit on an ERC‑4626‑style vault that used a one‑wei deposit to manipulate exchange‑rate math and drain liquidity. (research.blockscope.co) Multiple security analyses and court filings state the vulnerability originated in Resupply’s implementation rather than in Curve’s core protocol—an attribution investigators repeatedly flagged. (cryptorank.io) The judge’s order specifically barred threatening or abusive statements against Wong, and filings note the two respondents did not appear in court or immediately respond to requests for comment. (finance.yahoo.com) Legal observers highlight Singapore’s six‑year defamation limitation period, which preserves liability for historical posts and increases the legal risk of persistent online accusations. (ainvest.com)
