Knicks take 2-0 East semifinals lead with 108-102 Game 2 win over Sixers

- The Knicks beat the 76ers 108-102 at Madison Square Garden on May 6, taking Game 2 and a 2-0 lead in the East semifinals. - Jalen Brunson scored 26, Karl-Anthony Towns added 20 points and 10 rebounds, and Philadelphia collapsed late with just 12 fourth-quarter points. - Joel Embiid missed Game 2 with ankle and hip issues, leaving the Sixers chasing the series before it shifts to Philadelphia.

The Knicks are up 2-0, and the shape of this series is getting pretty clear. New York beat Philadelphia 108-102 on Wednesday night at Madison Square Garden, then closed the game with the steadier offense, the cleaner possessions, and the healthier star situation. That last part matters a lot. Joel Embiid didn’t play, and without him the Sixers had just enough shot creation to hang around, but not enough structure to finish. (espn.com) ### How did New York win this one? The game stayed tight for three quarters. Philadelphia actually led 90-89 going into the fourth. Then the Knicks won the last period 19-12. That was the whole game. New York didn’t blow the Sixers away — it just executed better when the possessions got heavier and the margin for error disappeared. (espn.com) Knicks? Jalen Brunson did what playoff lead guards are supposed to do — settle the game down, get to his spots, and make the late possessions feel organized instead of frantic. He finished with 26 points, including 8 in the fourth quarter. Karl-Anthony Towns gave New York the other big pillar with 20 points, 10 rebounds, and 7 assist(espn.com) three places, which is why the Knicks could survive an off night from deep. (nytimes.com) ### What went wrong for Philadelphia late? Turnovers and shot quality, basically. The Sixers committed 18 turnovers, and Tyrese Maxey had 6 of them. That doesn’t erase his 26 points, but it shows the burden he was carrying. Philadelphia also managed only 12 points in the fourth (nytimes.com)oo far from the rim and too late on the clock. (nytimes.com) ### How big was Embiid’s absence? Huge. Philadelphia ruled Embiid out before the game with a sprained right ankle and sore right hip after initially listing him as probable. That changed the whole geometry of the night. Without Embiid, the Sixers lost their bailout option, their(nytimes.com)orge, but the offense had no real anchor once New York tightened up. (nba.com) ### Did the Knicks dominate statistically? Not in every category. Philadelphia actually shot better from 3, 38% to 27%, and the rebounding was basically even. But New York shot 51% overall, moved the ball better with 25 assists, and protected possessions better with 13 turnovers to Philadelphia’s 18. That’s the quieter playoff formula — fewer wasted trips, more pressure on the other team to be perfect. (espn.ph) ### Why does 2-0 feel so important here? Because the Sixers didn’t just lose a road game — they lost one of the two best chances to steal control before the series moved. Now they head back to Philadelphia down 2-0 and still unsure about Embiid’s availability. That’s the catch. A close loss is survivable. A close loss while your best player is hurt and your offense is wobbling is a different kind of problem. (espn.com) ### What should you watch next? Watch Embiid first. If he comes back, the series changes immediately because Philadelphia’s half-court offense gets a center of gravity again. If he doesn’t, the burden on Maxey and George gets extreme, and New York can keep turning every late game into a test of composure. Right now, the Knicks look better built for that test. (usatoday.com) ### Bottom line This wasn’t a blowout. It was more revealing than that. The Knicks looked like the team with the cleaner answers, and now they’re two wins from the conference finals. (espn.com)

Get your own daily briefing

Scout delivers personalized news, insights, and conversations tailored to your role and industry.

Download on the App Store

Shared from Scout - Be the smartest in the room.