3,000+ coding questions resource

The X status at could not be retrieved by public scraping tools during verification, so the post’s author handle, timestamp and embedded-host link were not available from that endpoint. (x.com) A broad web search did not surface a single canonical repository matching the tweet; instead, public GitHub archives show multiple community collections that each advertise “3,000+” solved or curated problems, for example kamyu104/LeetCode-Solutions and dipta007/Competitive-Programming. ( ) An independent education-provider listing explicitly cites “3,000+ coding problems” as part of an academy curriculum, indicating the 3K figure is used across both community repos and some cohort programs rather than pointing to one unique centralized host. (ccbp.in) A commercial tracker marketed on Gumroad advertises metadata and curated solutions for “3K+ questions,” with a free tier covering question metadata and a paid tier providing 1.5K+ solution walk‑throughs, illustrating how some 3K assemblies are packaged as paid or freemium products. (xiaoyehua.gumroad.com) Tools that can retrieve historical post metadata—Tweet Binder’s advanced search and similar services—note that full historical tweet archives or engagement reports for older posts are a pro/paid feature, so obtaining the original tweet’s engagement counts and link previews likely requires those paid tools or direct access to the poster’s timeline. (tweetbinder.com) In short, public verification did not produce the specific repo metadata (author, license, file structure, language breakdown, or host stars/forks) for the X link provided; resolving those open points requires either the live X thread or a mirrored-host link that exposes repository metadata. (x.com)