Trump loses tariff power
- The U.S. Court of International Trade threw out President Trump’s 10% global tariff on May 7, saying his fallback legal theory under Section 122 failed too. - The tariff had covered most imports for up to 150 days, and the administration is now building a refund process for duties already collected. - That leaves Trump heading into his May 14-15 Beijing summit with Xi Jinping minus his broadest live tariff threat.
Tariffs are supposed to be leverage. That is the whole point. You raise the cost of selling into the U.S. market, then you trade relief for concessions. But Trump just lost the legal power behind his backup tariff plan, and the timing is brutal — it happened less than a week before his Beijing summit with Xi Jinping. ### What did the court actually kill? A three-judge panel at the U.S. Court of International Trade struck down Trump’s 10% global tariff on May 7. This was not the older, bigger tariff fight under the emergency-powers law. This was the replacement plan — a flat 10% duty the administration imposed in February under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 after the Supreme Court had already knocked out the earlier worldwide tariffs. The court said this fallback move was unlawful too. (politico.com) ### Why was Section 122 such a big deal? Because it was fast and broad. Section 122 lets a president respond to balance-of-payments problems with temporary import surcharges, but only within tight limits. Trump’s team used it as a legal workaround after losing the first tariff case. Basically, they needed some tool that could keep pressure on trading partners while the bigger legal battle kept grinding through appeals. The court decided this statute did not stretch far enough to support a near-universal 10% tariff. (politico.com) ### Why does this matter right now? Because Trump is due in Beijing on May 14 and 15 for a summit with Xi Jinping. If the 10% tariff had survived, it would have been a live bargaining chip hanging over nearly every importer. Now that chip is gone, at least for the moment. The administration can still threaten narrower trade actions later, but the simple, across-the-board pressure tool is off the table unless an appeal revives it. (politico.com) ### What about the refund portal? That is the second hit to leverage. Yahoo Finance reported that the administration opened a tariff-refund process and expects checks this summer for duties collected under the invalidated 10% tariff. Once businesses start expecting money back, the tariff stops feeling like a durable negotiating weapon and starts looking more like a temporary legal mess. Companies can wait out a mess. They have a harder time planning around a stable tax. (cnbc.com) ### Does this mean Trump has no tariff power left? No — but it means his easiest broad tariff tools keep getting rejected. The earlier emergency-tariff regime under IEEPA was already struck down in 2025, and now the Section 122 replacement has gone down too. The administration still has other trade laws available, like more targeted authorities tied to specific industries or countries. The catch is speed. Those routes are narrower, slower, and usually more cumbersome. (finance.yahoo.com) ### So what fills the gap in Beijing? Turns out the agenda may tilt toward geopolitics. CNBC says Iran, the Strait of Hormuz, and broader security issues are likely to crowd the summit, with trade items like tariffs and rare earths getting less room than business wanted. That does not make trade irrelevant. It just means Trump arrives with weaker immediate coercive power and more need to bargain through diplomacy, not just import taxes. (cafc.uscourts.gov) ### Why do businesses care so much? Because uncertainty is often worse than a bad rate. A known tariff can be priced in. A tariff that appears, disappears, gets appealed, and may be refunded later scrambles contracts, sourcing, and inventory decisions. Importers now have one more reason to think the administration’s trade policy can be delayed in court before it fully bites. (cnbc.com) ### Bottom line? Trump did not just lose a case. He lost a simple, blunt negotiating weapon days before meeting Xi. That does not end the trade fight — but it changes the balance from “pay now or deal” to something much murkier. (politico.com)