OKC keeps Shai and Holmgren in Game 2 starting five vs. Lakers

- Oklahoma City kept its Game 1 starters for Game 2 on May 7 — Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Ajay Mitchell, Lu Dort, Chet Holmgren, and Isaiah Hartenstein. - The key wrinkle was Ajay Mitchell staying in for injured Jalen Williams, and that same group helped OKC beat Los Angeles 125-107. - It matters because OKC doubled down on size and secondary ballhandling, then left home up 2-0 before the series shifted west.

Oklahoma City didn’t get cute for Game 2. That was the news. Mark Daigneault kept the same starting group he used in Game 1 against the Lakers — Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Ajay Mitchell, Lu Dort, Chet Holmgren, and Isaiah Hartenstein — and then watched that plan hold up again in a 125-107 win that pushed the Thunder to a 2-0 series lead. (si.com) ### Wait — wasn’t Jalen Williams supposed to start? No. Jalen Williams was still out with a left hamstring strain, so the real decision was whether Oklahoma City would change the replacement. It didn’t. Mitchell got his third straight playoff start, which tells you this wasn’t just a one-game patch. The Thunder clearly think his ballhandling matters against the way the Lakers are loading up on Gilgeous-Alexander. (si.com) ### Why keep Ajay Mitchell in there? Because the Lakers are trying to make someone else initiate. In Game 1, Oklahoma City’s own beat coverage framed Mitchell as the best active option behind Shai for handling pressure, especially when Los Angeles denies the first pass or sends extra bodies early. Tha(si.com)izer on the floor from the opening tip. (si.com) ### Why the two-big look again? Because Holmgren and Hartenstein solve different problems at once. Holmgren gives OKC spacing and weak-side rim protection. Hartenstein gives it bulk, screens, extra passing, and a body to throw into the paint. Against a Lakers team with LeBron James, Deandre Ayton, and(si.com)a center on the floor twice — one to stretch the defense, one to absorb the wrestling match. (si.com) ### Did the lineup actually work? Yes. That’s the part that makes this more than a pregame note. Oklahoma City won Game 1 by 18, then won Game 2 by 18 again. Holmgren and Gilgeous-Alexander scored 22 each in the second win, and the Thunder’s broader formula held — size, defense, enough creation around Shai, and a bench that can change tempo once the starters set the table. (nba.com) ### What does this say about OKC’s series plan? It says the Thunder think their answer is already on the roster card. They didn’t react to one game. They repeated the structure. That usually means a coaching staff believes the matchup edge is systemic, not situational. Dort handles the toughest perimeter work. Holmgren and Hartenstein anchor the interior. Mitchell helps keep the offense from becoming too Shai-dependent. (si.com) ### What about the Lakers side? The context matters here too. Luka Doncic remained out for Los Angeles, and Jarred Vanderbilt was also unavailable after getting hurt in Game 1. So the Lakers were already thinner and smaller in the ways that matter most against this Thunder frontcourt. That made OKC even less likely to abandon a lineup built to punish pressure and control the paint. (si.com) ### So what’s the real takeaway? The starting five itself wasn’t flashy. The signal was. Oklahoma City had a reason to improvise and chose continuity instead. Then it won again. When a playoff team repeats a lineup under pressure, it’s usually saying something simple — this is our answer until you prove otherwise. (si.com)

Get your own daily briefing

Scout delivers personalized news, insights, and conversations tailored to your role and industry.

Download on the App Store

Shared from Scout - Be the smartest in the room.