CENTCOM redirects 62 ships, disables 4
- U.S. Central Command said on May 11 it has redirected 62 commercial ships and disabled four vessels enforcing its blockade on Iranian ports. - Three named tankers — Hasna, Sea Star III, and Sevda — were stopped by U.S. Navy F/A-18s on May 6 and May 8. - The update shows the blockade launched April 12 is widening from airstrikes into direct control of Gulf commercial traffic.
Shipping is the story here — not just warplanes or missiles. The new thing is that U.S. Central Command says it has now redirected 62 commercial ships and disabled four vessels while enforcing a blockade on traffic entering or leaving Iranian ports. That matters because it pushes the confrontation with Iran into the day-to-day plumbing of global trade, especially around the Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz. The gap until now was whether this was mostly a military air campaign with naval backup, or a real maritime chokehold. It now looks a lot more like the second. ### What actually changed this week? The fresh number is 62 redirected ships and four disabled vessels, posted by CENTCOM on May 11. A few days earlier, CENTCOM’s own public releases were still talking about “more than 50” redirected ships, alongside three disabled tankers. So the count moved up fast — and the message got sharper. This is no longer framed as a few isolated interdictions. It is being presented as a sustained blockade with cumulative totals. (middleeastmonitor.com) ### Which ships were disabled? CENTCOM has publicly named three of them. On May 6, U.S. forces disabled the Iranian-flagged tanker *Hasna* in the Gulf of Oman after repeated warnings, using a 20mm cannon fired from an F/A-18 Super Hornet launched from USS *Abraham Lincoln*. On May 8, U.S. forces disabled *Sea Star III* and *Sevda*, also Iranian-flagged tankers, with precision strikes from another F/A-18 launched from USS *George H.W. (middleeastmonitor.com) Bush*. CENTCOM says all three were trying to reach Iranian ports. The fourth disabled vessel has shown up in the running total, but it is not named in the releases surfaced here. ### Why does “redirected” matter so much? Because redirected ships are commercial ships. That means the U.S. is not just hitting Iranian military assets — it is shaping where civilian maritime traffic can and cannot go. In practical terms, that is what a blockade is. You do not need to sink ships to squeeze trade. You just need to make insurers, shipowners, and crews decide the route is not worth the risk. (centcom.mil) It is basically a giant “turn around now” zone backed by carrier aircraft. ### When did this blockade start? CENTCOM’s press archive shows the blockade was announced on April 12, 2026. By April 19, U.S. forces were already boarding or stopping vessels suspected of heading into Iranian ports. By early May, the enforcement pattern had escalated into aircraft physically disabling tankers that kept going after warnings. So this did not appear overnight. It has been building in steps — declaration, interception, boarding, then disabling vessels. (middleeastmonitor.com) ### How does this connect to the wider war? It sits inside Operation Epic Fury, the broader U.S. campaign against Iran that began on February 28, 2026. Defense Department fact sheets tie that operation to a huge mix of air, naval, and missile-defense assets, including B-1 bombers, carriers, destroyers, and maritime patrol aircraft. So the blockade is not some side mission. It is one arm of a much larger coercive campaign — military pressure in the air, at sea, and around Iran’s export routes. (centcom.mil) ### Why is the Gulf the hard version? Because the Gulf is narrow, busy, and economically loaded. The Strait of Hormuz is the bottleneck, but the enforcement actions cited here are also happening in the Gulf of Oman and Arabian Sea approaches. That gives the U.S. room to stop ships before they reach Iranian ports, while still affecting traffic tied to the strait. Think of it less like closing a door and more like controlling the hallway before the door. (media.defense.gov) ### What is the immediate risk now? The risk is miscalculation. Once fighter jets are firing on tankers’ rudders or smokestacks, the line between “enforcement” and a broader naval clash gets thin fast. Even if the vessels are unladen, each interception raises the chance of casualties, insurance shocks, or retaliatory action by Iran or allied groups. And every additional redirected merchant ship tells the market that Gulf traffic is being actively managed by force, not just threatened by rhetoric. (centcom.mil) ### Bottom line? This update matters because it turns a vague blockade into a measurable one. Sixty-two redirected ships means the U.S. is already influencing commercial behavior at scale. Four disabled vessels means it is willing to back that pressure with direct force when warnings fail. The story is no longer just about strikes on Iran. It is about who controls movement through one of the world’s most sensitive shipping corridors. (centcom.mil)