Pakistan widens regional broker role

- Pakistan spent the week turning diplomacy into a strategic message — highlighting Taliban talks in China and its role in the Iran-US ceasefire. - Ishaq Dar said Islamabad helped bring Iran and the US into direct talks for the first time in 47 years after a truce first announced on April 8. - That matters because Pakistan is pairing crisis mediation abroad with harder deterrence messaging toward India at home and overseas.

Pakistan is trying to do two things at once. It wants to look like the region’s emergency diplomat — the state that can still talk to everyone when things get dangerous. But it also wants to show that diplomacy does not mean softness, especially after a year of sharper military signaling toward India. That balancing act was on display this week as Pakistani officials celebrated their role in the Iran-US ceasefire and pointed to direct talks with Afghanistan’s Taliban government. ### What changed this week? The immediate shift was rhetorical but important. On May 7, Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar said Pakistan had helped bring Iran and the United States into direct talks for the first time in 47 years and was now trying to turn an indefinitely extended ceasefire into a permanent peace. Then, on May 10, Pakistan’s ambassador in Washington used the first anniversary of “Marka-e-Haq” to argue that Pakistan’s strategic importance and peace-broker role were growing, not shrinking. (pakistantoday.com.pk) ### What was Pakistan’s role with Iran and the US? Islamabad says it helped move the two sides from war management into actual contact. The first public version of that story came on April 8, when Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said Pakistan had helped secure a two-week ceasefire and would host follow-on talks in Islamabad. Since then, Pakistani officials have kept stressing the same point — the truce was not just a pause, but proof that Pakistan can mediate between adversaries that do not trust each other. (pakistantoday.com.pk) ### Why could Pakistan do that? Basically, Pakistan had access where others did not. It has working ties with Washington and Tehran, shares a long border with Iran, and even represents some Iranian diplomatic interests in Washington. That makes Islamabad unusual — not neutral in some abstract sense, but usable to both sides in a crisis. The catch is that mediation only helps if both sides want an off-ramp, so Pakistan’s role depended on timing as much as skill. (france24.com) ### What about the Taliban talks? Those were more direct and more awkward. Pakistan confirmed on April 2 that it was holding peace talks with Afghanistan’s Taliban government in Urumqi, with China trying to broker a durable ceasefire after weeks of fighting that had killed hundreds and disrupted trade and travel. Islamabad framed the talks as necessary diplomacy, but it also said the burden remained on Kabul to take “visible and verifiable action” against militants using Afghan soil against Pakistan. (france24.com) ### Did those talks actually calm things down? Partly, but not cleanly. UN humanitarian reporting at the end of April said hostilities had dropped from the March peak and were mostly confined to border provinces after the April 1-7 technical talks in Urumqi. But the same update said shelling continued, and violence ticked up again on April 27. So the talks looked less like a settlement and more like a pressure-release valve. (usnews.com) ### Why bring all this up now? Because anniversaries are useful political stages. Pakistani officials used the first anniversary of “Marka-e-Haq” to tell two audiences something specific: foreign capitals should treat Pakistan as strategically indispensable, and India should not mistake diplomatic language for weakness. Rizwan Saeed Sheikh said exactly that in Washington, while military messaging at home emphasized deterrence and the risks of escalation between nuclear-armed states. (unocha.org) ### So what is Pakistan really trying to prove? That it can be both a frontline state and a convening state. In plain English — Pakistan wants credit for helping stop wars, not just for surviving near them. If that claim sticks, Islamabad gets leverage with Washington, Gulf capitals, China, and maybe even with rivals who would rather avoid another regional fire. (pakistantoday.com.pk) ### Bottom line Pakistan is widening its regional role by turning crisis access into political capital. But the broker image only holds if the ceasefires it touts — with Iran and with Afghanistan — keep holding long enough to look like more than a pause. (pakistantoday.com.pk) (france24.com)

Get your own daily briefing

Scout delivers personalized news, insights, and conversations tailored to your role and industry.

Download on the App Store

Shared from Scout - Be the smartest in the room.