Trump and Xi set for talks
- Donald Trump and Xi Jinping are set to meet in Beijing on May 14-15, with talks covering Iran, Taiwan, AI, nuclear issues and trade. - A key live item is whether they extend the U.S.-China rare-earths deal, which a senior U.S. official said remains in effect for now. - The bigger point is that war with Iran has pushed security and energy ahead of tariffs, even as businesses still want trade relief.
The Trump-Xi meeting matters because it is not just a trade summit anymore. It is turning into a catch-all negotiation between the world’s two biggest powers — with war, energy, chips, Taiwan and supply chains all jammed onto the same table. The immediate news is concrete: Trump is due in Beijing on May 14 and 15 for face-to-face talks with Xi Jinping, and U.S. officials say the agenda now spans Iran, Taiwan, artificial intelligence, nuclear issues and trade. ### Why is this summit bigger than trade? Because the old U.S.-China script has broken. A few months ago, the obvious focus would have been tariffs, export controls and industrial policy. Now the Iran war has scrambled the order of importance. Washington wants Beijing to use its leverage with Tehran, while Beijing wants to protect its energy interests and avoid a wider regional shock that would hit shipping and growth. (al-monitor.com) ### What exactly is happening this week? Trump and Xi are expected to hold their first in-person talks in more than six months in Beijing on May 14-15. Before that, both governments confirmed another round of trade talks in Seoul involving Chinese Vice-Premier He Lifeng and U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. That tells you this is being staged carefully — not improvised at the last minute. (al-monitor.com) ### Why do rare earths keep coming up? Because rare earths are the most tangible piece of leverage on the table. They feed into aerospace, electronics, magnets and advanced manufacturing. A senior U.S. official said the current rare-earths arrangement with China is still in effect and that an extension will be announced at the appropriate time. That makes the minerals deal the easiest thing for both sides to point to as proof the summit achieved something. (al-monitor.com) ### Why is Iran suddenly central? Basically, oil and escalation risk. China is a major buyer of Iranian oil, and the U.S. wants Beijing to push Tehran toward a deal with Washington. If the fighting around Iran and the Strait of Hormuz worsens, energy prices jump, shipping gets riskier and everybody imports inflation. That means a summit that looks bilateral on paper is really also about the global economy. (straitstimes.com) ### Where do Taiwan and AI fit in? They are the harder, less solvable parts. Taiwan is the core security flashpoint in the relationship, and AI sits right beside export controls, chips and military competition. Those issues are unlikely to get “fixed” in one meeting. The realistic goal is narrower — stop them from blowing up while both sides make progress somewhere easier, like minerals or selected trade channels. That is an inference from the agenda officials previewed and the preparatory talks now underway. (al-monitor.com) ### So should markets expect a big trade breakthrough? Probably not. The catch is that the summit agenda is now overloaded. When leaders spend time on Iran, nuclear risk and Taiwan, there is less room for the detailed bargaining needed to unwind tariffs or reset technology controls. Even analysts watching the meeting closely frame trade progress as possible but secondary to immediate geopolitical risk. (al-monitor.com) ### What would count as a real win? A small, specific deliverable. An extension of the rare-earths deal. A signal that trade channels stay open. Maybe language that lowers the temperature on Taiwan or commits both sides to keep talking on AI and security. Nobody should confuse that with a reset. But in this relationship, preventing a new shock is sometimes the win. (cnbc.com) ### Bottom line This meeting matters because Washington and Beijing are trying to stabilize several dangerous problems at once. The headline may mention talks, but the real test is narrower — can Trump and Xi produce one concrete step that calms markets without pretending the deeper rivalry has gone away. (al-monitor.com) (straitstimes.com)