Artemis III lander choices heating up

NASA says it’s closing in on key decisions for Artemis III — and one of the big uncertainties is which lunar lander architecture will be chosen, with SpaceX and Blue Origin still vying for roles. (arstechnica.com) Recent reporting frames the lander question as a schedule and capability hinge for returning humans to the surface, meaning decisions now will shape the overall Artemis cadence. (explosion.com)

NASA is no longer treating Artemis III as a straight shot to the Moon. The agency’s current plan is a 2027 mission in low Earth orbit where the Orion crew capsule docks with one or both commercial landers, instead of trying the first landing on that flight. (nasa.gov) That change moved the biggest question from “can Orion get there” to “which lander is mature enough to trust.” NASA says Artemis III will test rendezvous, docking, life support, communications, propulsion, and the new moon spacesuits with a commercial lander in orbit. (nasa.gov) A lunar lander is the part that works like a ferry between orbit and the surface. Orion can carry astronauts around the Moon, but it is not built to descend to the lunar South Pole and climb back up again. (nasa.gov) Space Exploration Technologies, better known as SpaceX, already holds NASA’s original Artemis III landing contract. NASA’s Human Landing System page still says SpaceX’s Starship lander is assigned to carry astronauts down and back for Artemis III and Artemis IV. (nasa.gov) Blue Origin was picked later under NASA’s “sustaining” lander competition for Artemis V, which is the mission after Artemis IV. NASA’s contract timeline says Blue Origin won that award in May 2023 to develop its Blue Moon lander for longer-term lunar missions. (nasa.gov) What changed this year is that NASA opened the door to flying Blue Origin earlier than expected. The agency’s Artemis III page now says the 2027 demonstration mission will test “one or both” landers from SpaceX and Blue Origin in low Earth orbit. (nasa.gov) That makes Artemis III less like Apollo 11 and more like Apollo 9, the 1969 mission that tested the lunar module in Earth orbit before a landing attempt. NASA’s new plan is to prove the pieces can meet, dock, power up, and support a crew before committing astronauts to a descent near the Moon’s south pole. (nasa.gov) The two landers are not small variations on the same machine. NASA describes Starship Human Landing System as about 165 feet, or 50 meters, tall with an elevator to move astronauts between the cabin and the surface, while Blue Origin’s Blue Moon is a separate family of cargo and crew landers built around a different architecture. (nasa.gov) (blueorigin.com) Recent reporting says NASA is closing in on decisions now because the lander choice affects the whole mission sequence, not just the last few hours before touchdown. If the agency flies one provider in 2027, that company gets the inside track on proving docking, crew operations, and schedule credibility before the first landing date is set. (arstechnica.com) NASA’s public schedule still points to early 2028 for the first Artemis lunar landing. So the argument over SpaceX versus Blue Origin is really an argument over which hardware becomes the pacing item for putting boots on the Moon again for the first time since Apollo 17 in December 1972. (nasa.gov) (reuters.com)

Get your own daily briefing

Scout delivers personalized news, insights, and conversations tailored to your role and industry.

Download on the App Store

Shared from Scout - Be the smartest in the room.