China fills Middle East vacuum, says Hodges
- Retired U.S. General Ben Hodges says China is exploiting a Middle East security gap, using diplomacy, trade, and infrastructure to gain leverage. - The clearest marker is money: the Middle East drew $39 billion in 2024 Belt and Road deals, with Saudi Arabia alone taking nearly $19 billion. - That matters because Beijing is pairing investment with diplomacy, while Russia and Iran are aligning more openly against Western pressure.
China is not replacing the U.S. in the Middle East in a military sense. Not yet. But it is getting harder to miss what Ben Hodges is pointing at — Beijing keeps showing up where Washington looks distracted, overextended, or simply less trusted. The shift is not one dramatic takeover. It is a slow accumulation of deals, mediation attempts, and political positioning that gives China more room to operate. (singjupost.com) ### What is Hodges actually warning about? Hodges’ basic point is that power vacuums do not stay empty. In his recent interview, he argued that China is playing a long game in the Gulf and wider Middle East, watching U.S. friction with Iran, shipping insecurity, and regional doubts about American staying power, then moving i(singjupost.com)ier, but often more durable. (singjupost.com) ### Why does the Middle East matter so much to China? Energy, shipping, and geography — basically the hard plumbing of the global economy. China buys huge volumes of Gulf energy, depends on sea lanes that run through chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz, and sees the region as a bridge linking Asia, Africa, and Europe. If B(singjupost.com)rices or maritime traffic. (cfr.org) ### What has China done beyond talk? Quite a lot, and mostly in ways that look practical rather than ideological. China brokered the 2023 Saudi-Iran restoration deal in Beijing — still its biggest diplomatic trophy in the region. Then the economic side kept growing. In 2024, the Middle East became the top destination for Belt and Road engagement, with $39 billion in deals, and(cfr.org)t that buys meetings, access, and patience from local governments. (mfa.gov.cn) ### Why is Iran central to this? Because Iran sits at the intersection of energy, sanctions, shipping risk, and great-power rivalry. Beijing has tried to present itself as a political interlocutor rather than a belligerent. This week, China’s diplomacy around the Iran war moved back into focus ahead of a Trump-Xi meeting, with Chinese officials talking to Tehran while pr(mfa.gov.cn)ions. China does not need to “take Iran’s side” in every respect to benefit from being the power that can still pick up the phone. (apnews.com) ### Where does Russia fit in? More as a coordinating partner than a junior extra. In March 2025, China, Russia, and Iran held a Beijing meeting that stressed sanctions relief, diplomacy, and continued coordination through forums like BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. A separate China-Russia joint statement in May 2025 (apnews.com)oscow-Beijing alignment, there is real documentary backing for it. (fmprc.gov.cn) ### Is China really filling a “vacuum”? Partly — but the catch is that the vacuum is selective. Regional states still want U.S. military protection, intelligence ties, and weapons. They are not dumping Washington. What they are doing is hedging. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and others increasingly treat China as an economic superpartner and diplomatic option, even while(fmprc.gov.cn)harder to counter. (cfr.org) ### Why is this harder for the U.S. to answer? Because China is competing with a different toolkit. It is not promising to police the region the way America did after the Cold War. It is offering infrastructure, technology, energy demand, and a seat at the table without the same lectures on internal politics. That does not mean regional governments trust China more across the (cfr.org)full costs of regional security. (cfr.org) ### So what is the bottom line? Hodges is really describing a strategic drift problem. If the U.S. leaves gaps in attention or credibility, China does not need to win the Middle East outright. It just needs to become too embedded to ignore. And with money, mediation, and Russia-Iran coordination all moving in the same direction, that is exactly what looks to be happening. (si([cfr.org)ay-from-conflict-in-hormuz-w-lt-gen-ben-hodges/))