Judge Tosses Key Evidence in Mangione Trial
- On May 18, New York Justice Gregory Carro suppressed some backpack evidence in Luigi Mangione’s state murder case but allowed prosecutors to keep central items. - The ruling kept out a magazine, cellphone, passport, wallet and computer chip, but left prosecutors with a gun, notebook and handwritten notes. - Sept. 8 is the scheduled start of Mangione’s New York state trial; his separate federal jury selection is set for Oct. 13.
New York Supreme Court Justice Gregory Carro ruled on May 18 that prosecutors cannot use some items police found in Luigi Mangione’s backpack when he was arrested at a McDonald’s in Altoona, Pennsylvania. Carro said the initial search at the restaurant was an improper warrantless search, suppressing a gun magazine, cellphone, passport, wallet and computer chip. But he allowed other evidence found later at the police station, including a gun and notebook that prosecutors say tie Mangione to the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. Mangione, 28, has pleaded not guilty, and his New York state trial is scheduled to begin on Sept. 8. ### Which evidence did the judge throw out, and which evidence stayed in? Carro said the McDonald’s search crossed the line because Mangione’s backpack was not within reach while he was detained by Altoona police. In court and in his ruling, he said that meant the items recovered during that first search had to be suppressed. Those items included a magazine, cellphone, passport, wallet and computer chip. (abcnews.com) The later stationhouse search survived. Carro found that second review of the backpack qualified as a valid inventory search, allowing prosecutors to use the alleged 3D-printed gun, a notebook and handwritten slips of paper that ABC described as purported escape routes. NBC New York and other outlets reported the ruling also left in place writings prosecutors have described as a manifesto. (abcnews.com) ### Why did the judge split the evidence that way? Carro said the legal difference turned on where the bag was and what police were doing at each stage. At the McDonald’s, he found there was no immediate safety need that justified opening the backpack without a warrant because Mangione could not reach it. Courthouse News, citing the ruling, reported that Carro wrote there was “no possibility” Mangione might retrieve a gun from the bag at that point. (abcnews.com) Pennsylvania officers had argued the bag might contain a bomb or gun. Carro rejected that reasoning as a basis for the first search, according to Courthouse News and ABC News, but accepted the later stationhouse inventory as lawful. That distinction is what preserved the prosecution’s most important physical evidence while knocking out several other seized items. (abcnews.com) ### What do prosecutors still have for the state trial? Prosecutors say the gun recovered from the backpack matches the weapon used to kill Thompson on Dec. 4, 2024, outside a Manhattan hotel. They also say the notebook and other writings speak to motive. NBC New York reported that one entry described a plan to target a health insurance executive, while ABC News reported prosecutors cited a line saying, “The target is insurance.” (abcnews.com) Reuters reported the ruling was a partial loss for Mangione because he had sought to keep the possible murder weapon out of evidence entirely. At the same time, the defense won suppression of several personal items and some statements Mangione made to Altoona officers, including an answer about why he initially gave a false name, ABC reported. (abcnews.com) ### Where did this dispute come from in the first place? Dec. 9, 2024, was the day Altoona police arrested Mangione after a five-day manhunt, according to NBC New York and Reuters. The fight over the backpack evidence has been central to the pretrial case because police found the gun, writings and other items after spotting him at the restaurant. Carro’s ruling came about five months after he held hearings on how officers searched the bag and what statements Mangione made after his arrest. (usnews.com) Brian Thompson was killed in Manhattan in December 2024, and Mangione faces both state and federal cases tied to the shooting. The state case includes murder and weapons charges, while the federal case includes stalking-related charges, according to NBC New York and ABC News. ### What happens next in the two cases? Sept. 8 is the scheduled start date for Mangione’s New York state trial, and NBC New York reported the trial is expected to last four to six weeks. (nbcnewyork.com) ABC News said the state proceedings will now move forward with the narrowed evidence list set by Carro’s ruling. Oct. 13 is the scheduled start of jury selection in the federal case, with opening statements and testimony set for Nov. 4, NBC New York reported. (nbcnewyork.com) Those dates leave Mangione facing back-to-back proceedings in New York after the May 18 ruling defined what jurors in the state case are expected to see.